They are using a plugin called easing-slider. But I agree with Pinako, static for something like that would be better. No point using a blogging system for a simple jQuery based content slider, it's just overkill imo.

Surely if you put your phone in silent mode the shutter sound isn't played?

The camera upload is permanent space. They have been doing that since they added the auto camera upload for their Android App.

The free space Mop is referring to is the offers that certain phone manufacturers are doing where you are given X gb for free for a year.

Depends what the advantages are of rockbox over the current gen Ipod nano and vice versa.

You're forgetting that MS Office has a massive share of the office processing market. It is the main software used by companies all over the world. They are also releasing a tablet which will have their new version of office on. Windows 8 is being released later this year which I have personally tried and is actually not too shabby even if it is just a developers release. With Windows 8, they will make money off of its apps, just like Apple does with its Macs. They are basically just doing what almost every other tech company is doing, using patents to make money. I don't see them going anywhere anytime soon. Apple on the other hand... 

Yeah, but spotify isn't illegal. They pay royalties.

As I don't torrent much beyond the latest debian/ubuntu update, I'm not 100% familiar with them, but I was always under the impression that they were pretty unsecure if you seeded. (in a public tracker)

They are very insecure. Your IP address can be seen by anyone else downloading the torrent. How do you think people are caught? Grab a list of all the IP's downloading illegally, send it off to the ISP with a court order and they have evidence that you were downloading illegally.

Not sure about the US, but in the UK, according to our law, its not as simple as that as an IP address merely proves a location, not who. So for them to prosecute you, they would have to get computer forensics to look at your computer. So by the time they've done that, the time, cost and effort just isn't worth it for them.

Music, website backups, minecraft server backups, Java projects, PHP stuff etc

Never come across that before, I've only ever seen that happen when I start the Android emulator.

So I just moved over from a single dedicated server, to 2 dedicated servers for minecraft. The previous one had everything set up including multicraft.

These 2 didn't. So I installed apache, mysql, java (<- all using yum), and multicraft (includes FTP). Its running Centos 5.8 (Final) btw.

I also opened up the ports in iptables

However I'm getting binding errors if the server ever crashes and attempts to restart itself

22.06 12:47:50 [Server] WARNING Perhaps a server is already running on that port?
22.06 12:47:50 [Server] WARNING The exception was: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
22.06 12:47:50 [Server] WARNING **** FAILED TO BIND TO PORT!
22.06 12:47:50 [Server] INFO Starting Minecraft server on x.x.x.x:25565
22.06 12:47:50 [Server] INFO Loading properties
22.06 12:47:50 [Server] INFO Starting minecraft server version 1.2.5

It works fine when I stop it and start manually though.

This is my iptables (pretty new to this but it seems to work)
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 3306 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 20 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 21 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8193 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT
-A OUTPUT -p tcp -m tcp --sport 3306 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p icmp -m icmp --icmp-type any -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p esp -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p ah -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -d 224.0.0.251 -p udp -m udp --dport 5353 -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 631 -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 631 -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 25565 -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p udp -m state --state NEW -m udp --dport 25565 -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
COMMIT
I'm getting the problem on both servers so I'm assuming its something I've not done as I wasn't getting this problem on the previous one. Any ideas?

It gets better still.

Still got to go through parliament which could prove difficult as many of the MP's from the coalition are against it.

Still not as bad as http://open.nysenate.gov/legislation/bill/S6779-2011